POOL BLASTER CX-1 - Limpiador robótico inalámbrico para piscinas, aspiradora automática para piscinas enterradas y sobre el suelo, aspiradora

My second one has stopped working after a year and a half. The first one I purchased lasted 2 years. Does a decent job. Got to get another one. Bottom line - it costs $100 a year to keep your pool clean with this product. Not bad.

This is our 4th Pool Blaster and our 2nd Pool Blaster Max CGThe later model Max CG lasts much longerWe’ve used these vacs for our pool for many yearsThey are efficient and convenient over hooking up tubes to vacuumIt’s a simple one tool very sufficient tool needed for any size and type of pool.There are extras you can buy if needed.When we had a hurricane some years back we were able to buy an additional vacuum bag that will pick up leaves sand and minute debrisGreat pool tool!!!

I have a smaller, less than 10,000-gallon inground pool. Let me just begin with if your goal is to remove leaves and bigger debris from your pool then this product is not for you. You should probably go buy yourself a leaf skimmer bag or a pool robot that crawls around the bottom and sucks leaves. But, if your goal is to remove the fine particles that have settled at the bottom of your pool, things like dirt, sand, silt, tree pollen, the kind of things that a pool skimmer net, or a bottom dwelling pool robotic won't capture then this is the product for you! If you're wondering what the difference is between the $199 Pool Blaster Max Li, and the $328 Pool Blaster Max Li CG Commercial Grade handheld pool vacuum it would be this! The Max Li CG model offers approximately 33% more suction …

I’m really compromised on how to rate the overall Pool Blaster Max. As for its cleaning, ease of operation and cleanup it is clearly a 5 IMHO. However, the charging port is a disaster and as bad as the operation is good. Every time I need to charge the unit I must sand the contacts on the unit and the charger, without fail. I have had other robots etc and NEVER have had such issues with all being used in the same pool.Other than the charging, the unit itself is great!!! It does an awesome job collecting sand, dirt and small particles and is very easy to operate and clean when finished. BUT, the charging port is an issue.That said, I would still buy the unit and deal with the annoying, horribly designed charging port.

Update - 10/25 there are much better vacuums out there. Better charging systems, better filtering systems. I have bought three or four of these and I have not been able to get more than five or six months out of them. I switched to the Ryobi pool vac and it has much better suction, easier to clean the filter and at this point we had not had to replace the filter. External battery, so when the battery dies you you can just put in another battery pack.UPDATE- 5/2/25 The only issue I have with this vacuum is the horrible charging system and the price. I will never buy one of these vacuums with the large adapter charger (see photo below) again. I'll spend less money and get the smaller one with a better charger. Other than that and the price, this is an awesome vacuum. I use it for my pool …

Here’s an honest pool vac review from someone who actually uses the things. We got a swim spa and so I needed a vaccum for sand and silt pick up not handled by the pool filter. On the swim spa the pool side and the spa side have pleated paper filters which don’t really pick up much of the debris that ends up in the bottom or the steps. Well the first cordless pool vac was the high end teal blue and yellow one that starts with E. DO NOT BUY ONE OF THOSE! After it abruptly died I read reviews again and ordered the “Pool Blaster Max CG” way better suction on the Pool Blaster Max CG but I wouldn’t consider it commercial grade. Also the opening for sucking up debris is just over 1” across so think of marbles. I don’t know how they sucked up leaves in the commercial but it isn’t happening in …

I have a 10,000 gallon kidney shaped pool. Shallow side is 3.5 feet deep. Deep side is 6 feet deep. The bottom isn't flat and it curves up on the sides from bottom to top.I'm experienced with maintaining a pool. I have a System 3 diatomaceous earth filter that has 53 sq ft of filter space. Run the pump 12 hours a day at 2200rpm to achieve balance between energy usage and turning the pool over (happens about every 3 hours according to the math).I loath hauling out my pole, sweeper, filter canister, and connecting all of this to the pump via the skimmer to vacuum the floor and sides of my pool. Take too long, too many nuances. Been doing it this way for decades. I figured technology could make it easier for me. Aside - I don't use an auto vacuum since I have dogs that swim all the time. …

We bought one of these in July, 2021.It is SO much easier to use than hooking up a vacumn head and hose to your filter.Also, the suction on this is MUCH better than using a hose hooked to your filter.It comes with 2 filter bags. One is for fine sand and silt on the bottom and the other is for larger debris like leaves.The fine sand and silt bags works best for most everything. (We live in a dusty, often windy, dry area, where dust blows into the pool and sinks and settles at the bottom which becomes silt. We have more sand/silt here than leaves.)The Pool Blaster Max CG has made my life much easier.The only complaints I have are,1. It is really hard to get the charging plug into the unit properly.It has to be just right or it won't charge.2. I wish the charge lasted just a little bit …